The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins by Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing | A Book Review by Sampurna Das
The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins
Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015. vii, and 331 pages
Reviewed by Sampurna Das
Anthropologist
Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing’s The Mushroom at
the End of the World is a rich multispecies ethnography, traces the growth
of a particular kind of Mushroom (matsutake mushroom) in the age of capitalism,
and in a way emphasises on the relation between humans and nonhuman beings that
go into matsutake mushroom foraging, exporting and consumption.
The
preface, aptly titled Enabling
Entanglements, explains the shifts in the way nature is understood over
time. Nature is always seen as universal and passive, which could be tamed.
Eventually, the shift happened that enabled looking into the entanglements of
different living species. The human-centric science scholarship slowly took
into consideration the importance of nonhuman interventions. Based on fieldwork
between 2004 and 2011 on the aromatic matsutake mushroom of Japanese origin,
Tsing tries to discuss these entanglements through a “riot of short
chapters that are like flushes of mushrooms after rain” (p. viii). Growing
particularly in human-disturbed forests, which in the book are explained as
fallouts of capitalism, matsutake mushrooms show resilience and the lateral
relations amongst various species – be it humans, red pine trees, fungi and
nematodes. This approach, which focuses on interactive relations among humans
and nonhumans allows the readers to rethink ideas of rationalisations, wherein
nonhumans are subordinated by human activities. As shapers of the world, the
relations of matsutake mushroom, pine, fungi and nematodes deserve much more
recognition.
By
tracing the growth of matsutake mushroom, Tsing also highlights the multiple
layers of interactions and dependency within the humans. While matsutake
foragers belong to cultural minorities and refugees (which includes the white
American antifederalist and Vietnam War veterans seeking refuge in the forest,
as well as Hmong, Mien, and Khmer immigrants from war-torn parts of Southeast
Asia), its consumers were mainly from the aristocrat class as not many could
not afford this special Mushroom growing in the shade of red pines. Matsutake
had become a luxury item, used as perks, gifts or bribes (p. 67). Later, to
cater to the growing demands, in 1980s matsutake mushrooms were imported from
the United States. Hinting at the social stratification and how in a way
stratification is further reproduced through the mushroom commerce, Tsing emphasises
that world-making is about collaborations.
Spending
time in Oregon, in the U.S. Pacific Northwest, Tsing showed across a few
chapters that imports led to the development of supply chains - something as
inconsequential as Mushroom has linked individuals and economies across
continents. In the process, the mushroom business has provided some meaningful
employment to the migrant and refugee foragers. Still, more importantly, it
enabled freedom from war and violence that otherwise disturbed their lives. As
a species that grows in the degraded environments, matsutake mushroom stands as
a symbol of hope in a modern capitalist world that is inherently characterised
by despair and “terrors of indeterminacy” (p.1). The process of foraging,
packaging and exporting the mushrooms sees the matsutake’s journey from an alienated
commodity, a kula-like gifting commodity to finally as “trophy of freedom” (p.
127).
Tsing hints at the
crux of the book when she says, “Making world is not limited to humans” (22), for
her world-making projects, may overlap, allowing multiple species to work
together. Accepting this intersection leaves no scope to maintain a
hierarchical binary of humans over nature. The book is an addition to the
growing genre of multispecies ethnography that moves beyond the human-nature
binary. It wishes to start, or at the least take forward a conversation on the
said perspective. At around 300 pages, this book is also one that tries to find
hope in capitalism, unlike many others. By using a simple language, Tsing’s
book becomes readable for a wider audience. The photographs at the beginning of
each of the few sections also help in this direction. Midway through the book,
Tsing acknowledges “big histories are always best told through insistent if
humble, details” (p.111). However, few parts, somewhere in the third section,
may overwhelm the reader with its rich factual account - an issue which can be
otherwise be dealt with reading the book in parts. Above all, the book is
important for those interested in understanding relations of nature and
society, the multispecies perspective of looking at the world and ethnographies
in general.
Sampurna Das is a doctoral candidate at the Department of Sociology, Delhi School of Economics (DSE), University of Delhi, India.
Comments
Post a Comment