Red Tape: Bureaucracy, Structural Violence, and Poverty in India by Akhil Gupta| A review by Parnika Praleya
Red Tape: Bureaucracy, Structural Violence, and Poverty in India by Akhil Gupta, 2012, Duke University Press, ISBN: 9780822351108, 0822351102, Pages: 368.
Reviewed by: Parnika Praleya, University of Chicago
Akhil Gupta's
engaging book begins with the puzzle of - a high number of deaths due to
poverty in India not being viewed as a crisis despite the inclusion of the poor
in national sovereignty and democratic politics. Gupta is intrigued by the
invisibility of such violence in the public domain. Why are these deaths not
viewed as a crisis? What makes this violence invisible? What is the reason
behind this seeming apathy despite the state deriving legitimacy from bettering
lives of the poor? To answer these questions, Red Tape builds on Gupta's
earlier work dealing with themes of development, agrarian transformation, state
practice, globalization, and environmental history. Gupta's penchant for
approaching these "economic" issues through an anthropological lens
offer not only new theories for thinking about them but also juxtapose
questions of postcolonial development with politics and governance.
Gupta's compelling
theory of "structural violence" borrows from Galtung's and Paul Farmer's
work. Gupta argues that violence against the poor is enacted through the
everyday practices of bureaucracies (p. 33). Bureaucratic action systematically
produces arbitrary outcomes in its provision of care, actively condemning the
poor to death through state policy, deaths which were preventable (p. 6). Gupta's
detailed theoretical framework to support his argument makes the book engaging.
The painstaking development of the concept of "structural violence", of
why these deaths are more than just thanatopolitics (letting die), the move
away from the reified state to understand the production of arbitrariness make
the theoretical sections of this book compelling. Rather than being another
book utilizing Foucault and Agamben's concepts, Gupta builds upon their
framework in intelligent ways.
To look at
the everyday practices of bureaucracy, Gupta rejects Foucault's and Agamben's reified
state in which the disciplinary power is inherently rational and organized. The
first two chapters of the book build on Western theories of bare life,
biopolitics and governmentality and interrogate their relevance to a
postcolonial context. In doing so, there is a refreshing shift away from
viewing developing countries in general, and India in particular, at an earlier
stage of development, with Western developed nations as their telos of
development and modernity. While he uses Foucault to argue the normalization of
high deaths due to poverty as a statistical fact, he also underscores the
undertheorized nature of violence implicit in biopower. Biopower understood
through a managerial focus does not explain why some people get killed, and
others don't (p. 16). With examples from his, fieldwork Gupta shows the
inefficiencies of Census data collection, questioning the statistical
underpinning of the biopolitical project. Additionally, he argues that the poor
are homo sacer, where they can be killed without sacrifice, without a
state of exception (unlike Agamben's argument).
The rigorous
theoretical intervention is supported through an ethnographically thick
argument that connects bureaucratic actions to the arbitrariness of outcomes.
To investigate how ethics and politics of care are arbitrary and this
arbitrariness is systematically produced, Gupta considers three themes of
interaction between bureaucracy and the poor: corruption (chapters 3 and 4),
inscription (chapters 5 and 6) and governmentality (chapter 7). The rich
ethnographic vignettes of corruption are replete with Gupta's subtle
interpretations in conversation with people which add depth to his ethnographic
work. For example, his astute interpretation of the body language, spatial
arrangement and tone of conversation in the action of two patwaris (p. 84 -85)
is evidence of ethnographic work of high calibre. His investigation of the role
of narrative in the cultural construction of the state and the normalization of
corruption focuses on looking at newspapers and comparison of the representation
of the state in a popular novel and a well-known ethnography of India. By
astutely utilizing quasi-ethnographic sources like popular novels, Gupta
provides a diverse ethnographic understanding of how poor people's understanding
of the state is shaped by representations of corruption and circulation of
discourses about corruption.
The
investigation of the political consequence of bureaucratic insistence on
writing in a context of widespread illiteracy is a fascinating way of looking
at structural violence and production of arbitrariness. Moving away from the
assumption that writing is functional, Gupta argues that the state is
constituted through bureaucratic writing. The poor show agency in dealing with
this situation by counterfeiting documents, educating their children and
through political connections. His argument would have been bolstered if he
would have grappled with Chatterjee's (2004) "political society" in
some depth. Chatterjee's thesis on the community-based modality of claims
making by political society seemed to be an explanation for the phenomena being
observed (how the poor were engaging with political mobilization to get around
bureaucratic hurdles, the Bharatiya Kisan Union being a case in point).
The
investigation of the political consequence of bureaucratic insistence on writing
in a context of widespread illiteracy is a fascinating way of looking at
structural violence and production of arbitrariness. Moving away from the
assumption that writing is functional, Gupta argues that the state is
constituted through bureaucratic writing. The poor show agency in dealing with
this situation by counterfeiting documents, educating their children, and
making political connections. His argument would have been bolstered if he
would have grappled with Chatterjee's (2004) "political society" in
some depth. Chatterjee's thesis on the community-based modality of claims
making by political society seemed to be an explanation for the phenomena being
observed (the manner in which the poor were engaging with political
mobilization to get around bureaucratic hurdles, the Bharatiya Kisan Union
being a case in point).
These minor
points notwithstanding, Gupta's engaging local level ethnography into everyday
bureaucratic procedures of a disaggregated state perpetrating violence is
particularly pertinent during the pandemic. The Indian state's approach to the
pandemic was a draconian nation-wide lockdown announced with four hours' notice.
What unfolded was a spectacle of misery, with migrant workers left to fend for
themselves. Gupta's analysis of unintended outcomes by showing how they are
systematically produced by the friction between agendas, bureaus, levels, and
spaces that make up the state (p. 47) helps make sense of what has been called
the "migrant crisis" and the Indian government's handling of the
pandemic by controlling narratives, normalizing infections and deaths through
statistics, and its healthcare and policing hamstrung by their daily
processes.
Bibliography
Chatterjee, Partha. The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.
Gramsci, Antonio. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (Volumes 1, 2 & 3). Trans. Hoare, Quinton and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. New York: International Publishers, 2005 (1971).
Scott, James. Seeing Like a State: How Certain
Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale
University Press, 1998.
***
Parnika Praleya is currently a graduate student at the University of
Chicago. Her research interests lie in institutions and contentious politics
and her research focuses on structural determinants of media polarization in
parliamentary democracies and looking at the impact of war-time social
movements in civil war-affected regions. When not researching, she can be found
reading Wodehouse, dabbling in photography, and traveling. Her blog, Maverick
Feet (https://maverickfeet.wordpress.com ),
is a reflection of all that she is.
Comments
Post a Comment